MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1130034143 · doi:10.1002/pon.3874

Abstracts

2015· article· en· W1130034143 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

VenuePsycho-Oncology · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPain Management and Opioid Use
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Cancer InstituteNational Institute of Mental HealthCancer Council QueenslandUniversity of Texas MD Anderson Cancer CenterCenters for Disease Control and PreventionNational Institutes of HealthLet's Beat Bowel CancerH. Lundbeck A/SUniversity of Sri JayewardenepuraDeutsche KrebshilfeSeoul National UniversityMackay Memorial HospitalGrantová Agentura České RepublikyNational Health and Medical Research CouncilFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São PauloAustrian Science FundNational University of SingaporeNational Research FoundationNational Breast Cancer FoundationFogarty International CenterCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchCancer Institute NSWLivestrong FoundationMassachusetts General HospitalJapan Society for the Promotion of ScienceWashington State UniversityTeenage Cancer TrustZonMwUniversity of California, San FranciscoOsher Center for Integrative MedicineLance Armstrong FoundationInstitut Gustave-RoussyMedical Research CouncilNational Research Foundation of KoreaKing's College LondonArmstrong FoundationSeoul National University HospitalSusan G. Komen for the Cure
KeywordsClass (philosophy)Multiplicity (mathematics)Calculus (dental)Context (archaeology)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: Taking into account the multiplicity of clinical variables in the oncological patient, it is my purpose to demonstrate the importance of formalizing an approaching device in psycho-oncology through the first projective technique for oncological patients. Considering the notion of total pain, establishing the

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.566
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.070
GPT teacher head0.382
Teacher spread0.313 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePsycho-OncologySame topicPain Management and Opioid UseFrench-language works237,207