MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W113016544 · doi:10.1007/978-1-59745-154-3_2

In Vitro Maturation and Embryo Production in Cattle

2006· article· en· W113016544 on OpenAlexaff
Marc‐André Sirard, Karine Coenen

Bibliographic record

VenueMethods in molecular biology · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicReproductive Biology and Fertility
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBlastocystOocyteIn vitro maturationAndrologyBiologyIn vitro fertilisationHuman fertilizationEmbryoIn vitroEmbryogenesisCell biologyAnatomyGeneticsMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

When immature bovine oocytes are released from their follicles and are cultured in standard maturation medium, they resume the first meiotic division. The alteration of basic maturation conditions can affect oocyte competence significantly, as reflected by the morula and blastocyst yield after in vitro fertilization. The conditions used from the beginning of maturation up to the blastocyst stage have been shown to influence not only the developmental competence but also, potentially, the normal epigenetic make-up of the embryo. The methods described in this chapter outline the different steps of in vitro production of bovine embryos up to the blastocyst stage in semidefined conditions: (1) oocyte maturation, (2) in vitro fertilization, and (3) in vitro development. The first section explains procedures of ovary collection and oocyte aspiration and selection for in vitro maturation. The second section involves methods for the preparation of semen and oocytes for fertilization. The last section explains the best conditions to obtain blastocysts after 8 d of in vitro culture.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.450
Threshold uncertainty score0.303

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.381
Teacher spread0.362 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations24
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMethods in molecular biologySame topicReproductive Biology and FertilityFrench-language works237,207