MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Abstract 2897: Targeting Engraftment of Endothelial Progenitor Cells to Ischemic Tissue by Ultrasound-mediated Transfection of Stromal Cell Derived Factor-1

2007· article· en· W11341829 on OpenAlexaff
Michael A. Kuliszewski, Jeremy Kobulnik, Jonathan R. Lindner, Duncan J. Stewart, Howard Leong‐Poi

Bibliographic record

VenueCirculation · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMesenchymal stem cell research
Canadian institutionsSt. Michael's Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineStromal cellNeovascularizationProgenitor cellStromal cell-derived factor 1HindlimbArteriogenesisBone marrowPerfusionLigationEndothelial progenitor cellIschemiaHoming (biology)Cell therapyPathologyAndrologyAngiogenesisStem cellInternal medicineCXCR4InflammationBiologyCell biology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The homing of endothelial progenitor cells (EPC) to sites of ischemic injury is critical to successful neovascularization. We hypothesize that ultrasound-mediated (UM) transfection of stromal-cell derived factor-1 (SDF-1) would enhance engraftment of exogenously administered EPCs and improve neovascularization in a rat model of chronic hindlimb ischemia. Methods: Bone-marrow derived EPCs were isolated from donor F344 rats, cultured for 7 days, labelled with CMTMR and injected (1 x 10 6 ) into recipient animals via a jugular vein. Unilateral hindlimb ischemia was created by iliac artery ligation in 32 rats. At day 14 post ligation, microvascular blood volume (MBV) and blood flow (MBF) in the hindlimb muscles were assessed by contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEU). Rats were assigned to 4 treatment groups: control untreated animals, EPCs alone, UM delivery of SDF-1 plasmid (500 μg DNA + 1x10 9 cationic microbubbles), and both UM delivery of SDF-1 + EPCs (n=8 per group). Perfusion was re-assessed at day 28. EPC engraftment was assessed using fluorescent microscopy. Circulating exogenous EPC numbers were determined by FACS at various time-points post injection. Results: Prior to EPC delivery, normalized MBV and MBF in ischemic muscle were similarly reduced in all groups. Control animals showed no changes in perfusion over time. By day 28, EPC treated animals had a significant increase in normalized MBV (1.04±0.24 vs 0.67±0.22, p<0.001), without significant improvements in MBF (0.44±0.13 vs 0.33±0.15, p=NS), while SDF-1/EPC treated animals had significant improvement in both normalized MBV (1.33±0.51 vs 0.67±0.22, p<0.001), and MBF (0.55±0.26 vs 0.33±0.15, p<0.001). Maximal exogenous circulating EPCs could be detected at 72 hours post injection. Fluorescent microscopy showed little to no CMTMR labelled cells in the non-ischemic hindlimb in all groups. In comparison, a rich population of cells was found in the ischemic hindlimb of both the SDF-1/EPC and EPC treated animals, with the SDF-1/EPC animals demonstrating the greatest density of EPCs. Conclusions: Ultrasound-mediated transfection of SDF-1 improves intravenous EPC targeting, enhancing EPC engraftment into chronically ischemic tissue and leading to greater neovascularization response.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.283
Teacher spread0.267 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCirculationSame topicMesenchymal stem cell researchFrench-language works237,207