MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W113672753

The DAMOCLES ice buoy drift experiments 2007 and 2008

2009· article· en· W113672753 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Michael Haller, B. Bruemmer, Andrea Lammert

Bibliographic record

VenueEGUGA · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicArctic and Antarctic ice dynamics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBuoySea iceWind speedEnvironmental scienceForcing (mathematics)MeteorologyClimatologyArctic ice packArcticGeologyOceanographyGeography
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Two ice drift buoy experiments were conducted in the framework of DAMOCLES to investigate the atmospheric forcing of sea ice (especially the dynamic forcing by cyclones) and to validate operational weather model analyses. During the DAMOCLES 2007 experiment 16 CALIB (Compact Air-Launch Ice Buoy) buoys were deployed in the central Arctic Ocean within a 400km x 400km array, centered around the French ship TARA. Up to 9 months CALIB buoys delivered data of pressure, temperature and position in about one-hourly intervals. During the DAMOCLES 2008 experiment 7 PAWS (Polar Area Weather Station) buoys were deployed in the Canadian part of the Arctic Ocean north of Ellesmere Island in April 2008. Two further PAWS were installed in autumn 2008 in the Beaufort Sea and the Laptev Sea. Since then the PAWS deliver data of pressure, air and ice temperature, relative humidity, wind speed and direction and position in three-hourly intervals. Buoy trajectories and measured data are presented. Wind forcing is quantified by the wind/drift relationship and the cross correlation of ice drift and wind. Comparisons of the buoy data with the operational analyses of ECMWF, DWD and HIRLAM models are shown.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.338
Threshold uncertainty score0.370

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEGUGASame topicArctic and Antarctic ice dynamicsFrench-language works237,207