Electrochemical Investigations of 4-Methoxypyridine Adsorption on Au(111) Predict Its Suitability for Stabilizing Au Nanoparticles
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A thermodynamic analysis of the adsorption of 4-methoxypyridine (MOP) on Au(111) surfaces is presented in an effort to determine its propensity to stabilize metal nanoparticles. The adsorption of MOP is compared and contrasted to the adsorption of 4-dimethylaminopyridine (DMAP), the latter of which is well-known to form stable Au nanoparticles. Electrochemical studies show that MOP, like most pyridine derivatives, can exhibit two different adsorption states. The electrical state of the metal, the pH of the solution, and the surface crystallography determine whether MOP adopts a low-coverage, π-bonded orientation or a high-coverage, σ-type orientation. A modified Langmuir adsorption isotherm is used to extract free energies of adsorption which are roughly 10% stronger for DMAP compared to MOP at equivalent conditions when expressed on a rational basis. The higher adsorption strength is attributed to DMAP's greater Lewis basicity. Qualitatively, MOP and DMAP adsorption are found to be completely analogous, implying that MOP-protected gold particles should be stable under conditions that favor the high-coverage adsorption state. Using a previously reported, single-phase synthesis, this is shown to be the case.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".