MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Angiotensin II‐Induced Erectile Dysfunction Prevented By Bradykinin B1 Receptor Antagonism

2015· article· en· W1142535486 on OpenAlexaff
Brittney A. McCormick, Julie‐Émilie Huot‐Marchand, Chad Carrol, Serge Carrier, Denis deBlois, Taben M. Hale

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSexual function and dysfunction studies
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityUniversité de Montréal
FundersNational Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute
KeywordsBradykininErectile dysfunctionInternal medicineEndocrinologyAngiotensin IIMedicineErectile tissueReceptor

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Chronic angiotensin II (AngII) treatment induces erectile dysfunction in rats. In penile erectile tissue, AngII stimulates smooth muscle contraction leading to detumescence, while bradykinin promotes relaxation to facilitate erection. AngII has been shown to increase bradykinin B1 receptor (B1R) expression in aorta however; an interaction between these systems has not been examined in erectile tissue. This study investigated the impact of bradykinin B1R antagonism on AngII‐induced erectile dysfunction. Sprague‐Dawley rats were treated with vehicle or AngII in the presence or absence of the B1R antagonist R‐954. After 4weeks, arterial pressure (MAP) and erectile function were assessed in anesthetized rats. AngII increased MAP and left ventricular mass, and significantly impaired erectile function relative to control. While concomitant B1R antagonism had no impact on AngII‐induced hypertension, it prevented the cardiac hypertrophy and erectile dysfunction. Impaired erectile responses were not associated with changes in cavernosal collagen content, ROS production, or endothelial NOS or SMAD2/3 expression. This study reveals for the first time that bradykinin B1R blockade can offset AngII‐induced erectile dysfunction independent of hypertension and unrelated to cavernosal tissue remodeling. Future studies will investigate mechanisms underlying this effect and provide insight into the inter‐regulation of the RAS and kallikrein kinin system in erectile function. Funding: APS STRIDE program (NHLBI; 1 R25 HL115473‐01), CMSHC

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.054
GPT teacher head0.291
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB JournalSame topicSexual function and dysfunction studiesFrench-language works237,207