MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Angiotensin II‐Induced Erectile Dysfunction Prevented By Bradykinin B1 Receptor Antagonism

2015· article· en· W1142535486 on OpenAlexaff
Brittney A. McCormick, Julie‐Émilie Huot‐Marchand, Chad Carrol, Serge Carrier, Denis deBlois, Taben M. Hale

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSexual function and dysfunction studies
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityUniversité de Montréal
FundersNational Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute
KeywordsBradykininErectile dysfunctionInternal medicineEndocrinologyAngiotensin IIMedicineErectile tissueReceptor

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Chronic angiotensin II (AngII) treatment induces erectile dysfunction in rats. In penile erectile tissue, AngII stimulates smooth muscle contraction leading to detumescence, while bradykinin promotes relaxation to facilitate erection. AngII has been shown to increase bradykinin B1 receptor (B1R) expression in aorta however; an interaction between these systems has not been examined in erectile tissue. This study investigated the impact of bradykinin B1R antagonism on AngII‐induced erectile dysfunction. Sprague‐Dawley rats were treated with vehicle or AngII in the presence or absence of the B1R antagonist R‐954. After 4weeks, arterial pressure (MAP) and erectile function were assessed in anesthetized rats. AngII increased MAP and left ventricular mass, and significantly impaired erectile function relative to control. While concomitant B1R antagonism had no impact on AngII‐induced hypertension, it prevented the cardiac hypertrophy and erectile dysfunction. Impaired erectile responses were not associated with changes in cavernosal collagen content, ROS production, or endothelial NOS or SMAD2/3 expression. This study reveals for the first time that bradykinin B1R blockade can offset AngII‐induced erectile dysfunction independent of hypertension and unrelated to cavernosal tissue remodeling. Future studies will investigate mechanisms underlying this effect and provide insight into the inter‐regulation of the RAS and kallikrein kinin system in erectile function. Funding: APS STRIDE program (NHLBI; 1 R25 HL115473‐01), CMSHC

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.055
Threshold uncertainty score0.887

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.054
GPT teacher head0.291
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB JournalSame topicSexual function and dysfunction studiesFrench-language works237,207