MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1143404506 · doi:10.2118/174450-ms

Evaluation of Thermal Efficiency of the Pre-Heat Period in the SAGD Process for Different Completion Methods

2015· article· en· W1143404506 on OpenAlex
Delon Saks, Mohammad Kyanpour, Ola Onamade

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueSPE Canada Heavy Oil Technical Conference · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir Analysis
Canadian institutionsBaker Hughes (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPetroleum engineeringInjectorHeat exchangerCompletion (oil and gas wells)Thermal efficiencyProcess (computing)Steam injectionThermalHeat transferEnvironmental scienceEngineeringNuclear engineeringMechanical engineeringMechanicsComputer scienceThermodynamicsChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract In the Steam Assisted Gravity Drainage (SAGD) process, the pre-heat is a very important step in the successful development of the steam chamber. The pre-heat period lasts months and is deemed complete when the temperature between the injector and producer is high enough to establish hydraulic communication. A uniform pre-heat along the wellbore is crucial to achieve steam chamber conformance throughout the life of the well pair. The efficiency of the pre-heat can be affected by several factors, with completion type being one of the most important among them. The objective of this study is to evaluate the impact of this factor on thermal efficiency during the pre-heat phase of the SAGD process. In this study, the completion practices in five major SAGD projects in Alberta, Canada (Suncor's Firebag and Mckay River, Cenovus' Christina Lake and Foster Creek, and ConocoPhillip's Surmont) were evaluated. The critical factor used to determine the efficiency of any completion type in the pre-heat process is the heat loss and heat exchange along the producer and injector wellbores and the completion components. This variation in thermal efficiency results from factors such as concentric versus eccentric dual tubing completion, and tubular size, length and configuration. The results of the study provide a comparison of different completion practices in the five major SAGD operations in Canada. The simulation modeling of the process, along with field experience and observations, helped to understand the impact of counter-current heat exchange and heat loss in concentric versus eccentric completions. Also, the results were used to quantitatively evaluate the impact that vacuum insulated tubing has on delivering energy to the reservoir and its associated thermal efficiency during the pre-heat process. This paper is aimed at providing a better understanding of the impact of different completion methods on thermal efficiency during the pre-heat period in the SAGD process. The study also incorporated actual field performance of the 5 major SAGD projects available in the public domain and AER reports.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.145
Threshold uncertainty score0.986

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.061
GPT teacher head0.334
Teacher spread0.272 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it