Art, Boys, and the Boy Scout Movement: Lord Baden-Powell
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Robert Stephenson Smyth Baden-Powell (1857–1941), founder of the Boy Scout Movement in 1907, was a British military hero during the Boer War. Within an ethos and era of empire-building, athleticism, soldier-heroes and the pursuit of “manliness,” Baden-Powell valued the arts and adapted his artistic skill to his wartime and Scouting activities. His own sketches and paintings are accomplished, and he exhibited his work in India, Southern Africa, and London— including sending a sculpture to the Royal Academy and regularly receiving payment for sketches that he sent to The Graphic magazine. He took his friends to exhibitions at the Royal Academy, visited the Paris Salon, and wrote about the importance for boys of learning to draw. Most of his publications are illustrated with his own line drawings, or those by his friends in the London Sketch Club. Observation and perceptual awareness were requirements for successful scouting, and he claimed that there was no better way to develop those skills than by drawing. Thus at a time when the practice of the arts is often seen as “feminine,” and boys may resist participating in art education, it is important to examine Baden-Powell's “masculine” use of the arts and his emphasis on learning through doing. In his study of the Boy Scouts, the YMCA, and their forerunners in the United States, Macleod (1983) makes an important point that “Although the behaviour of boys and their leaders in voluntary associations inevitably differed from what occurred in public schools, the patterns are nonetheless revealing because the boys and men were acting more freely than school pupils and teachers” (p. xvi).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.014 | 0.008 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.008 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".