MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Pressure Ulcer Monitoring: A Process of Evidence-Based Practice, Quality, and Research

2008· article· en· W115582487 on OpenAlexaff
Margaret B. Harrison, Marlene C. Mackey, Elaine Friedberg

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicPressure Ulcer Prevention and Management
Canadian institutionsOttawa HospitalQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineAuditGuidelineQuality managementChartPsychological interventionMedical emergencyHealth careRisk assessmentUnit (ring theory)PopulationEmergency medicineOperations managementNursingEnvironmental healthEngineeringBusinessManagement systemPsychologyManagement

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.688
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.717
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.688
Threshold uncertainty score0.385

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.6880.717
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.004
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0110.004
Bibliometrics0.0280.020
Science and technology studies0.0150.034
Scholarly communication0.0560.021
Open science0.0140.036
Research integrity0.0240.034
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.605
GPT teacher head0.573
Teacher spread0.032 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations18
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueThe Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient SafetySame topicPressure Ulcer Prevention and ManagementFrench-language works237,207