Desafíos éticos y políticos de las y los estudiantes de postgrado: nosotros-as también somos parte de la crisis del sistema educacional chileno.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper analyzes the relationship between ethics and politics in my experience as a fellowship holder, student and activist facing the student movement. This essay is divided into three parts. In the first part, I give an account of the main aspects of the student movement in order to situate the student demonstrations in Chile within a sociopolitical context. Then, I describe my experience as part of a collective process of discussion and action around this situation by showing what this learning space meant for the network of Chilean students abroad, in which I participated. Finally, I give an account of the *Sociologa de la Universidad de Concepcion y Master en Sociologia de la Universidad de Barcelona. Fue becaria del Programa Internacional de la Fundacion Ford 2010-2011. Actualmente es estudiante de la Maestria en Ciencias Politicas de la Universidad de Quebec en Montreal y becaria de CONICYT 2011-2013. Tambien es parte del Observatorio Ciudadano en Chile. Direccion postal: 4325 rue Marquette app. 206 Montreal, Quebec, Canada. Correo electronico: xcuadram@gmail.com Una version anterior de este trabajo fue presentado en el Seminario Internacional “Equidad y diversidad en la formacion de postgrado: Experiencias, aportes y reflexiones desde el IFP en America Latina” CATIE, Costa Rica, 12-14 de noviembre de 2012. Agradezco los comentarios y el estimulante debate que ha acontecido en torno a la elaboracion de este ensayo. En particular, mis reconocimientos a las contribuciones de Areli Escobar, Patricio Saavedra, Alonso Serradell, Paola Gonzalez y Douglas Smith. 152 isees_ no 13, julio diciembre 2013 reflections that motivated my involvement with the student movement in Chile and its demands. I argue that as graduate students and researchers we are part of the crisis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".