“Why we don’t go to school on Fridays᾿ On youth participation through photo voice in rural KwaZulu-Natal (« Pourquoi nous faisons l'école buissonnière le vendredi » Participation des jeunes qui veulent se faire entendre par la photo ...)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract. In this article, we draw on the example of the Friday Absenteeism Project, a photo voice project with sixth grade learners in a rural KwaZulu-Natal school, to interrogate the nature of participatory process and cultural production. In so doing, we explore a number of critical issues related to youth participation, including ethics, citizenship and democracy, false promises, life skills and youth participation, links to media, edutainment, art and social change, participation, and taking action. « Pourquoi faisons l'ecole buissonniere le vendredi » Participation des jeunes qui veulent se faire entendre par la photographie au KwaZoulou-Natal rural RESUME. Dans cet article, nous nous fondons sur l’exemple du projet Friday Absenteeism (absenteisme du vendredi), un projet qui donne un appareil photo a des eleves de sixieme annee dans une ecole rurale du KwaZoulou-Natal dans le but se faire entendre. Nous nous interrogeons sur la nature du processus participatif et de la production culturelle. Ainsi, nous explorons un nombre de questions critiques liees a la participation des jeunes dont l’ethique, la citoyennete et la democratie, les fausses promesses, les connaissances pratiques et la participation des jeunes, les liens avec les medias, le divertissement educatif, l’art et le changement social, la participation et l’action concrete.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.007 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".