Personlighet och Alexitymi hos unga kvinnor med samlagssmärta – en pilotstudie
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Aim. To investigate personality, alexithymia and personal relations in a cohort of seven women with superficial dyspareunia based on either LPV (localized provoced vestibulodynia) or painful vaginism. The purpose was to find background personality variables to address later in psychotherapy. Methods. Personality measurements were performed using Cloninger`s Temperament and Character Inventory – revised (TCI-R). Alexithymia was assessed by using the Swedish version of Toronto Alexithymia Scale – TAS-20. A semi-structured scale that focused on sexual problems and relations was constructed by the author. Results. Most women showed a personality profile with specific temperament and character traits. They can be described as cautious, careful, insecure, orderly, pessimistic, reflective, reserved, slow-tempered, solitary, stoical, systematic, and can be categorised as rigid, scrupulous and/or passive-dependent and they are close to fall out as alienated, obsessional and passive-avoidant. Conclusions. These women with LPV differ in personality, report difficulties in relations, have a tight bond to their mothers and are missing their absent fathers. More research needs to be done to point out the etiology of the psycho-somatic explanations to dyspareunia. The results show how important it is to consider the psychological aspects in the care of women with dyspareunia and to allow them to be offered psychological assessment and treatment.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.012 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".