MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1165577956 · doi:10.1079/9780851990828.0151

Stemming the urban tide: policy and attitudinal changes for saving the Canadian countryside.

2005· book-chapter· en· W1165577956 on OpenAlex
Hugh J. Gayler

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueCABI Publishing eBooks · 2005
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicAgriculture and Rural Development Research
Canadian institutionsBrock University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRedevelopmentGovernment (linguistics)Environmental planningGeographyAgricultureRural areaResource (disambiguation)Political scienceBusinessNatural resource economicsEconomicsArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This chapter first examines the nature of the problem of unsustainable urban development in North America. Then using a case study drawn from Canada's Niagara Wine Region, it examines urban pressures and the failure to protect valuable agricultural land. Niagara's emergence as an important wine region has brought into focus the need for a better protection of this land, which is being implemented through the introduction of 'Smart Growth' principles, in particular the intensification and redevelopment of existing urban areas. However, the way forward to a more permanent solution of the problem has come from a change of government in Ontario in October 2003 and the appointment of a Greenbelt Task Force to recommend a strategy for preserving the best agricultural and resource areas in southern Ontario.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Scholarly communication
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.706
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0030.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.194 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it