MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1167082939

In God Rejoice! Hymns & Psalms 2009-2012

2013· article· en· W1167082939 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Scott M. Hyslop

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Hymn · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicPentecostalism and Christianity Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHymnPraiseTheologyArtLiteratureSection (typography)Theme (computing)SoulPhilosophyClassicsHistoryComputer science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In God Rejoice! Hymns & Psalms 2009-2012 by Brian Wren. London: Stainer & Bell/Carol Stream, IL: Hope. ISBN 11 933710-11-X. $9.95.It is said that good things come in small packages, and that is indeed the case with this small collection of hymns from the heart, mind, soul, and pen of Brian Wren. In God Rejoicel marks the ninth collection of hymn texts written by Wren which has been jointly published by Hope with Stainer and Bell. The author mentions this mutually beneficial relationship in the foreword to this collection and dedicates the volume to the memory of George and Nancy Shorney. The thirty-six texts, paired with tunes both familiar and new, are divided into five sections:Section 1: Jesus: From Cradle to Cross - Hymns 1-3Section 2: Easter Hymns - Hymns 4-7Section 3: Church and Mission - Hymns 8-14Section 4: Praise - Hymns 15-18Section 5: Metrical Psalms - Hymns 19-36In section 1, Wren's interest in and study of theology is revealed in three well-crafted and eminently useful hymns. The first text, Come, Jesus Christ, meet us today briskly takes us through the life of Christ as infant, youth and man-deftly tying up and summing up these three stages of Christ's life into the common theme of:Come, Risen Christ, with bread and cup,your people still to feed.Come now, to love and lift us upand meet our every need.In section 2, Wren states that these four Easter hymns were written to be submitted to a hymn-writing competition being held by a Methodist Church in Vancouver, Canada. We are given a rare glimpse into his process of writing as these hymns allow us to see how one writer grapples with the same theme, Christ's resurrection, in different ways. It is interesting to note that while there are ideas common to all four texts, and phrases common to two of the texts, which are intentional on the part of the author, each of the all four texts stands eloquently on their its own.Section 3 is an eclectic set of texts which were requested, offered or commissioned to explore particular aspects of the church's life. I admit freely that I was both caught off-guard and completely taken by the first text in this set Accompany with singing-a hymn to be sung at the graveside or at the crematorium when an individual's mortal remains are commended to the ages. Wren writes the following regarding this text:No. 8 (Accompany with Singing) reacts against a sub-Christian trend that I believe pastors and churches should strongly and explicitly oppose and expresses my convictions on the matter in a tartly worded stanza probably better spoken than sung:Let no-one's flesh, in privatebe bundled to its plotor trundled to an ovenbehind a parking lot.As children tend and treasurea fading autumn leaf,befriend each fife departingwith public works of grief. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.482
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.212
Teacher spread0.188 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe HymnSame topicPentecostalism and Christianity StudiesFrench-language works237,207