MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W116758447

Field evaluation of ventilation wetting and drying of rainscreen walls in coastal British Columbia

2010· dissertation· en· W116758447 on OpenAlex
Ying Simpson

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueSpectrum Research Repository (Concordia University) · 2010
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHygrothermal properties of building materials
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBuilding envelopeFacadeCladding (metalworking)MoistureEnvironmental scienceCavity wallBrickEngineeringVentilation (architecture)MeteorologyGeotechnical engineeringStructural engineeringCivil engineeringGeographyMaterials scienceComposite material
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The climate in southern coastal British Columbia (BC) is characterized by a long rainy winter. Building envelope failures that have occurred in recent years in this region promoted the adoption of the rainscreen principle in both rehabilitation and new construction and are now mandatory in the wet regions of Be. In addition to the functions of a capillary break and drainage, drying in an air cavity behind the cladding of the rainscreen wall system may occur through cavity ventilation. Current practice varies in terms of cavity depth and vent heights for rainscreen walls clad with panel systems, especially with respect to the top slot vents. The awareness of potential drying provided by cavity ventilation initiated the idea of providing top vents on brick veneer walls recently in the BC construction industry. However, there exist different views on the drying provided by cavity ventilation based on existing research. Whether cavity ventilation would be beneficial for this climate remained open for discussion. To answer this question, a comprehensive research program was designed by Dr. Hua Ge with the candidate using a two-storey building envelope test facility at British Columbia Institute of Technology (BCIT) which Dr. Hua Ge developed. The candidate investigated twelve wall specimens, six clad with brick veneer and six clad with fibre cement panels, installed on the southeast façade, which faced the prevailing wind-driven rain direction. The test variables include cladding type, air cavity depth and height, vent configurations and initial moisture load in plywood sheathing to evaluate the impact of cavity ventilation on the drying and wetting of test walls. The hygrothermal conditions across the wall assemblies were monitored for moisture content (both resistive and gravimetric), temperature, relative humidity, air speed in the cavity and pressure differentials between top and bottom of each cavity. The on-site weather conditions were measured including wind speed, wind direction, solar radiation, horizontal rainfall, and wind-driven rain. Indoor conditions were controlled at 22±1°C and 55±5% RH In this study, the drying and wetting rates of plywood sheathing in the test walls during the winter and spring seasons were quantified, under-cooling effects on the temperature of cavity-surfaces of claddings and plywood sheathing were analyzed and the daily hours of condensation on the cavity-surface of claddings for all test walls were calculated. Simulation and measurements of MC in plywood sheathing for two brick veneer walls and two fibre cement walls were compared.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.367
Threshold uncertainty score0.880

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it