¿Las mujeres y los niños primero? Nuevas estrategias de inversión social en América Latina
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
espanolEn los ultimos anos, en America Latina se ha impulsado una serie de planes sociales, algunos de ellos enfocados en la ninez y la inclusion social. Sin embargo, aunque varias de estas iniciativas se tradujeron en importantes beneficios asociados a la reduccion de la pobreza, resultan claramente insuficientes a la hora de aliviar las cargas domesticas de las madres para mejorar su empleabilidad y, al mismo tiempo, generar espacios institucionalizados de aprendizaje y desarrollo infantil para los mas pequenos. Una verdadera politica de inclusion social requiere de la adopcion de medidas integrales, que contemplen la compensacion monetaria como asi tambien la inversion en servicios que permitan el desarrollo de capital humano. EnglishIn recent years, in Latin America, a series of social plans have been driven, Some of them focused in childhood and social inclusion. However, although various of these initiatives have been translated into important benefits associated with the reduction of poverty, they have clearly been insufficient when alleviating the domestic charge of mothers to improve their employability, and at the same time generating institutional spaces of learning and infant development for the oungest. One true policy of social inclusion requires the adoption of integral measures, which include monetary compensation as well as investment in services that allow for the development of human capital.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it