Bibliographic record
Abstract
The 3rd edition of Mary Bromily’s popular book on equine rehabilitation is a soft cover book comprising 218 pages divided into 8 chapters and 6 appendices. As a human trained physiotherapist, the author is very clear regarding the interpretation of the Veterinary Surgeon’s Act, United Kingdom, and the implications therein for nonveterinarians administering treatment to horses. The Act is included as Appendix 1 and the 1st page of the book includes a disclaimer to remind readers of the Act. Readers from other parts of the world would have to familiarize themselves with the regulations of their own country and jurisdiction of their licensing body. The book is written using some Oxford English terminology, which is confusing to Canadian readers. For example, the term “shells” refers to what we in Canada would call “caps” (retained deciduous teeth) and the term “pin-toed” refers to our term “pigeon-toed.” The book provides a cursory overview of topics pertaining to equine rehabilitation, including anatomy and physiology of the musculoskeletal system, the process of injury and repair, assessing the patient, several treatment modalities, comparison of the equine back to the human back, and common rider injuries. Some of the modalities covered include more widely known therapies such as: the application of hot and cold, massage, magnetic therapy, therapeutic ultrasound, light and laser therapy, transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS), hydrotherapy, and range of motion. Other more recent modalities are also covered, such as thalasso therapy. The author has also included a short section on long reining horses and ridden work, which may be of particular interest to a nonriding equine practitioner. Written in layman’s terms, coverage of the individual modalities is too brief for this book to provide a reference for a veterinarian wanting to learn and to apply the specific techniques. For the most part each modality is defined and the premise behind which they are purported to have beneficial effects is discussed. However, an equine practitioner may find the book helpful as an overview of some of the newer modalities.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".