MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W118010339

Equine Injury, Therapy and Rehabilitation, 3rd ed.

2008· article· en· W118010339 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Jenifer Parks

Bibliographic record

VenuePubMed Central · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldVeterinary
TopicVeterinary Equine Medical Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineRehabilitationManual therapyModalitiesHydrotherapyMassageTerminologyPhysical therapyAlternative medicinePathology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The 3rd edition of Mary Bromily’s popular book on equine rehabilitation is a soft cover book comprising 218 pages divided into 8 chapters and 6 appendices. As a human trained physiotherapist, the author is very clear regarding the interpretation of the Veterinary Surgeon’s Act, United Kingdom, and the implications therein for nonveterinarians administering treatment to horses. The Act is included as Appendix 1 and the 1st page of the book includes a disclaimer to remind readers of the Act. Readers from other parts of the world would have to familiarize themselves with the regulations of their own country and jurisdiction of their licensing body. The book is written using some Oxford English terminology, which is confusing to Canadian readers. For example, the term “shells” refers to what we in Canada would call “caps” (retained deciduous teeth) and the term “pin-toed” refers to our term “pigeon-toed.” The book provides a cursory overview of topics pertaining to equine rehabilitation, including anatomy and physiology of the musculoskeletal system, the process of injury and repair, assessing the patient, several treatment modalities, comparison of the equine back to the human back, and common rider injuries. Some of the modalities covered include more widely known therapies such as: the application of hot and cold, massage, magnetic therapy, therapeutic ultrasound, light and laser therapy, transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS), hydrotherapy, and range of motion. Other more recent modalities are also covered, such as thalasso therapy. The author has also included a short section on long reining horses and ridden work, which may be of particular interest to a nonriding equine practitioner. Written in layman’s terms, coverage of the individual modalities is too brief for this book to provide a reference for a veterinarian wanting to learn and to apply the specific techniques. For the most part each modality is defined and the premise behind which they are purported to have beneficial effects is discussed. However, an equine practitioner may find the book helpful as an overview of some of the newer modalities.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.075
Threshold uncertainty score0.252

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.003
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0750.049

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.084
GPT teacher head0.343
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePubMed CentralSame topicVeterinary Equine Medical ResearchFrench-language works237,207