Efficacy of an Internal Teat Sealant, Orbeseal, for Reduction of Clinical Mastitis during the First 60 Days Post-partum
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Clinical mastitis (CM) events often occur during the post-partum period and are important economically. Many CM cases result from infections that have been established during the dry period. In one study, 38.1% of clinical cases had the same bacteria isolated at some point during the dry period.4 Risk factors for development of new intramammary infections (IMI) in the dry period have been reviewed.2 Among the risk factors identified was failure to develop a natural keratin seal in 23.4% of teats.2 These open quarters were 1.8 times more likely to develop a new intramammary infection (IMI). Efficacy of the internal teat sealant, OrbeSeal* (OS) for prevention of new IMis during the dry period has been well established.1,3,5-7 The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of OS infused at dry-off for the reduction of new cases of CM during the first 60 days of lactation, as compared to routine intramammary dry cow antibiotic therapy (DCT).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".