Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Snow surface temperature (T s ) plays an important role in the formation of surface hoar or near-surface faceted crystals The goal of this study was to obtain detailed information on T s in different forest stands nelr the timberline. The investigations were conducted during clear nights and showed that the snow surface temperature is influenced very strongly by the forest canopy. While the air temperature was very similar on the different experimental sites, T s was higher in the forest than in the open field; on the south-facing slope the difference between the forest and the open field was 3–4.5°C, and on the north-facing slope approximately 3–7°C. Taking into account that ε air is 0.7 and ε tree is 0.94, the incoming radiation (I ↓) for the different experimental sites was calculated by the equation of Brunt (the canopy density was estimated using photographs taken with an 8 mm fish-eye). To calculate T s , air temperature and averaged values of the net radiation (because the net radiation (I) has only a small range of variation during clear nights) were used. The results show that the calculated values were higher than the measured values (by approximately 2°C). However, a better correlation was found by using lower values of the emissivity (ε air 0.67 and ε tree 0.91).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".