MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

BNIP3 regulates mitophagy and apoptosis in delayed neuronal death in stroke

2013· article· en· W1189365228 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Ruo‐Yang Shi, Jiming Kong

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAutophagy in Disease and Therapy
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
FundersManitoba Health Research Council
KeywordsNeuroprotectionMitophagyAutophagyApoptosisRegulatorCell biologyProgrammed cell deathWestern blotBiologyNeurotoxicityTUNEL assayGeneNeuroscienceMedicineInternal medicineGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Physiological level of autophagy promotes neuronal survival, while apoptosis contributes to delayed neuronal death in ischemic stroke. In this study, we show that the proapoptotic BCL‐2 family member BNIP3 is an upstream regulator for both processes. Specifically, deletion of BNIP3 gene is neuroprotective by affecting mitophagy and apoptosis pathways. We performed IHC, western blot, Co‐ip, ELISA, and cell transfection to analyze the BNIP3's regulation on mitophagy and apoptosis in cortical neurons and ischemic brains. Both BNIP3 wild‐type and knock‐out mice were used. In primary neurons exposed to OGD/reperfusion, BNIP3 was highly expressed, with the time course and expression levels of apoptosis‐related proteins (i.e. active caspase‐3, cytochrome C, and BAX) and autophagy‐related proteins (i.e. LC3, Beclin‐1, and LAMP‐2) positively regulated. Promoting or inhibiting autophagy pharmacologically didn't affect the expression patterns of BNIP3, indicating it is an upstream regulator. We also measured the brain damage of neonatal stroke in transgenic mice. TTC staining showed the infarct volume of ischemic brains was significantly reduced in BNIP3 KO mice compared to WT mice upon 3–7 days recovery. Silence of BNIP3 gene in cortical neurons of KO mice activated a robust autophagic response and decreased apoptosis, coordinately contributing to the neuroprotection in the KO animals after stroke. Grant Funding Source : Canadian Institute of Health Research, Canadian Stroke Network, Manitoba Health Research Council, Manitoba Institute of Child Health

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2013
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB Journal→Same topicAutophagy in Disease and Therapy→French-language works237,207→