Abstract 2026: Atrial Fibrillation Predicts Ventricular Arrhythmogenicity In Heart Failure
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is associated with appropriate ICD discharges in patients with primary prevention indications. We explored potential effect modifiers impacting on ventricular arrhythmogenic risk associated with AF. Methods and Results: A retrospective cohort study was conducted on 215 consecutive patients with ICDs for primary prevention having a left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) < <26>35% and followed for 1.3±0.7 years. Mean age was 61.0±0.7 years and 17% were women. Cox regression models were explored in subgroups of patients stratified by demographic parameters, prior medical and surgical history, physical exam features, laboratory findings, and results of diagnostic tests. Appropriate ICD discharges were received by 10% of patients. AF was associated with a 3.5 fold increased risk [95% CI (1,5, 8.1), P=0.005]. Effect modifiers for the relationship between AF and appropriate ICD discharges included QRS duration and QTc. In patients with a QRS>130 msec (N=93), 6 of 33 (18%) patients with AF received appropriate ICD discharges versus 2 of 60 (3%) without AF (P=0.03). In this subgroup, AF was associated with a hazard ratio of 5.1 (P=0.049). Among individuals with a QTc >440 msec (N=93), 6 of 32 (19%) AF patients received appropriate ICD discharges versus 1 of 61 (2%) without AF (P=0.01). AF was associated with a hazard ratio of 10.3 (P=0.031). Five of 28 patients (18%) with both prolonged QRS and QTc duration (N=77) that also having AF received appropriate ICD discharges compared to 0 of 49 of patients without AF (P=0.005). After adjusting for medical therapy, AF independently predicted appropriate ICD discharges in subgroups with and without QRS and QTc increase. Conclusion: AF portends increased risk for ventricular tachyarrhythmias in patients with heart failure, particularly when associated with conduction and/or repolarization abnormalities. This finding may reflect common depolarization and repolarization defects associated with the arrhythmic milieu contributing to AF and ventricular arrhythmias, or adverse consequences of AF on the complex neurohumoral/electrophysiological substrate underlying ventricular arrhythmogenesis in heart failure.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".