Towards a Framework for Enterprise End-User Development Initiatives: _x000D_ A Design Science Research Investigation.
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper presents an overview of a recently instigated research program aimed at devising a systems development and implementation framework for enterprise end-user development (EUD) initiatives. This research aims to investigate use-case scenarios, business process requirements, infrastructure requirements, implementation tactics, and technology governance issues related to the effective implementation and adoption of enterprise EUD technologies. We plan to investigate the efficacy of novel model-based systems design approaches as well as collaborative design processes among end-users and system developers as viable methodologies for EUD implementation. Principles and processes from design science research are being utilized to provide a roadmap for the research program. This paper outlines the study’s research design and its expected research outcomes. The outputs of this research have the potential to advance an understanding of development methodologies and implementation strategies for EUD-based self-service technologies, and facilitate the effective adoption and institutionalization of EUD initiatives in organizations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it