Hacer que los cuadros hablen: la problemática del marco en "Un novelista en el Museo del Prado", de Manuel Mujica Lainez
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Este art?culo se concentra en la naturaleza problem?tica del marco en su funci?n de delinear y definir, tanto en la esfera del orden social como en la relaci?n ontol?gica entre arte y realidad, adem?s de palabra e imagen. El cuento La bella durmiente, que procede del libro Un novelista en el Museo del Prado (1984), de Manuel Mujica Lainez, expone a la vista los marcos conceptuales que rigen la conducta social a trav?s de una representaci?n teatral, ?sta llevada a cabo por personajes de cuadros que pertenecen al Prado. A trav?s de un an?lisis del fracaso de esta pantomima, se ve c?mo la ruptura de marcos lleva a la desestabilizaci?n de las categor?as, tanto sociales como intelectuales, que forman la estructura ideol?gica de una sociedad. No obstante, bajo la ?ptica de la l?gica del l?mite hegeliano y seg?n esta narrativa de Mujica Lainez, el marco se revela como el lugar cuya transgresi?n sirve para la creaci?n de nuevas identidades y entidades.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.014 | 0.020 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.012 | 0.009 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".