MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1199346173 · doi:10.1177/0954407015598244

An engine cycle analysis of diesel-ignited ethanol low-temperature combustion

2015· article· en· W1199346173 on OpenAlex
Prasad Divekar, Usman Asad, Jimi Tjong, Xiang Chen, Ming Zheng

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part D Journal of Automobile Engineering · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemical Engineering
TopicAdvanced Combustion Engine Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Windsor
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDiesel fuelDiesel engineCombustionExhaust gas recirculationMean effective pressureHomogeneous charge compression ignitionThermal efficiencyMaterials scienceDiesel exhaustEnvironmental scienceWaste managementCombustion chamberAutomotive engineeringCompression ratioChemistryEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Modification of the fuel–air charge properties has the potential to improve the load range of low-temperature combustion with ultra-low nitrogen oxide emissions (less than 0.2 g/kW h) and ultra-low smoke emissions (less than 0.01 g/kW h). The ignition characteristics of the cylinder charge are altered by injecting the highly reactive diesel fuel into a homogeneous lean air–fuel mixture of low-reactivity fuel. The ethanol–diesel combination has been of particular recent interest since ethanol is a renewable biofuel. The additional advantages of ethanol include excellent anti-knock properties, high volatility and reduction in the compression work through charge cooling. In this work, a detailed investigation using diesel-ignited ethanol experiments was conducted on a high-compression-ratio (18.2:1) diesel engine. The emissions, the combustion performance and the thermal efficiency characteristics are analysed at different values of the exhaust gas recirculation, the intake boost pressure, the ethanol fraction and the diesel injection timing. The empirical investigations supported by detailed zero-dimensional engine cycle simulations indicate that a diesel injection timing close to top dead centre provides direct control over the ignition timing across the engine load range. The nitrogen oxide–soot trade-off of conventional diesel combustion, which is affected by exhaust gas recirculation, is minimized to achieve clean combustion over a wide load range (indicated mean effective pressure, 4–17 bar) with increased ethanol fraction and moderate intake dilution through a combination of modulation of the exhaust gas recirculation level and an increase in the intake boost pressure. The operation at low loads is constrained by the minimum diesel amount necessary for stable and efficient combustion while progressively retarded combustion phasing is necessary at higher loads to satisfy the physical engine constraints (peak cylinder pressure, less than 170 bar; peak pressure rise rate, less than 15 bar/deg crank angle). The improved understanding of this combustion strategy through experimental and theoretical research provides the necessary guidance for obtaining clean efficient full-load operation (demonstrated at an indicated mean effective pressure of 19.2 bar).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.198
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it