Insertion and Topology of Normal and Mutant Bestrophin-1 in the Endoplasmic Reticulum Membrane
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The vitelliform macular dystrophy type 2 (VMD2) gene mutated in Best macular dystrophy encodes a 585-amino acid putative transmembrane protein termed bestrophin-1. The vast majority of known disease-associated alterations are of the missense type, which cluster near predicted transmembrane domains (TMDs). To investigate bestrophin-1 membrane topology and to assess consequences of point mutations on membrane integration, we have analyzed the insertion of putative TMDs into the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) membrane. Out of six potential TMDs, our data suggest a topological model of bestrophin-1 with four transmembrane-spanning segments and one large cytoplasmatic loop between putative TMD2 and TMD5. Consequently, a relatively hydrophobic segment containing putative TMD3 (aa 130-149) and TMD4 (aa 179-201) is located within the cytoplasm. Furthermore, we show that three out of 18 disease-associated alterations investigated (I73N, Y85H, F281del) reveal measurable effects on membrane insertion suggesting that defective membrane integration of bestrophin-1 may represent a potential disease mechanism for a small subset of Best macular dystrophy-related mutations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".