MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W120283145

La Romería de San Isidro de Monesterio: una lección de patrimonio histórico -artístico popular (1944-1986)

2012· article· es· W120283145 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Antonio Manuel Barragán Lancharro

Bibliographic record

VenueRevista de estudios extremeños · 2012
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicArchaeology and Cultural Heritage
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArtSpanish Civil WarPolitical scienceLaw
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

espanolLa Romeria de San Isidro Labrador de Monesterio es sin duda la fiesta con mas arraigo en dicha localidad. Fiesta creada despues de la Guerra Civil, se ha creado y recreado con el paso del tiempo por el impulso popular bajo una tutela institucional. En este caso, se ha estudiado el periodo transcurrido desde su fundacion en 1944 hasta 1986, ultima edicion llevada a cabo por la Camara Agraria Local antes de la formacion de una asociacion encargada de su organizacion. Desde el punto de vista antropologico, se arroja luz sobre la formacion de una fiesta de caracter popular en la epoca contemporanea, y su continuidad a lo largo del tiempo. EnglishThe Pilgrimage of San Isidro Labrador Monesterio party is undoubtedly the most firmly rooted in the locality. Party created after the Civil War has been created and recreated over time by the popular impulse under institutional care. In this case, we have studied the period since its founding in 1944 until 1986, last edition held by the Camara Agraria Local prior to the formation of an association responsible for your organization. From the anthropological point of view, it sheds light on the formation of a popular party in the modern era, and its continuity over time.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.162
Threshold uncertainty score0.323

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0030.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0130.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.316
Teacher spread0.292 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevista de estudios extremeñosSame topicArchaeology and Cultural HeritageFrench-language works237,207