MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W121455941 · doi:10.1096/fasebj.21.6.a774

A JNK‐dependent pathway is required for HIV‐Vpr‐induced apoptosis in human monocytic cells

2007· article· en· W121455941 on OpenAlexaff
Sasmita Mishra, Jyoti Mishra, Ashok Kumar

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicHIV Research and Treatment
Canadian institutionsAgricultural Research Institute of OntarioUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsApoptosisCell biologyDownregulation and upregulationCell cultureMonocyteTHP1 cell lineProgrammed cell deathBiologyGeneImmunologyBiochemistryGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

HIV‐1 Vpr causes apoptosis in different kinds of cells including lymphocytes, monocytes, and neuronal cells. Persistently infected monocytic cells serve as a major reservoir of HIV at all stages of disease. It is believed that one of the reasons for monocytes in vivo to be protected from apoptosis is by secretion of different kinds of cytokines in response to HIV infection. C terminal moiety of Vpr is known to cause apoptosis in variety of cell types including monocytes. Herein we have demonstrated that Vpr c terminal peptide (52–96) causes apoptosis in monocytes and monocytic cell lines and the process was caspase dependent. Further, knowing the role of MAPKs in regulation of cell death, we determined the involvement of MAPKs in Vpr induced apoptosis in monocytes. Our results suggest that synthetic Vpr (52–96) and (1–45) peptides induced phosphorylation of all the MAPKs, whereas only Vpr (52–96) peptide induced apoptosis in monocytic cells. The results were confirmed by using JNK stealth RNA. Using a variety of strategies to manipulate JNK activity, we provided evidence that JNK activation is important in mediating Vpr induced apoptosis. Furthermore, Vpr induced apoptosis was mediated by downregulation of antiapoptotic genes Bcl2 and c‐IAP1 through activation of upstream JNK MAPK. Understanding the mechanism of apoptosis induced by Vpr will be beneficial for the development of therapeutic approaches.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.299
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB Journal→Same topicHIV Research and Treatment→French-language works237,207→