The interactomics of sortilin: an ancient lysosomal receptor evolving new functions.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The delivery of soluble lysosomal proteins to the lysosomes is dependent primarily on the mannose 6-phosphate receptor (MPR). The MPR has been demonstrated to attain the early endosomes via a process that requires the interaction of its cytosolic domain with the GGA and AP-1 adaptor proteins. Additionally, the MPR can be recycled back to the trans-Golgi network (TGN) through its interaction with the retromer complex. Interestingly, in I-cell disease (ICD), in which the MPR pathway is non-functional, many soluble lysosomal proteins continue to traffic to the lysosomes. This observation led to the discovery that sortilin is responsible for the MPR-independent targeting of the sphingolipid activator proteins (SAPs) and acid sphingomyelinase (ASM). More recently, our laboratory has tested the hypothesis that sortilin is also capable of sorting a variety of cathepsins that exhibit varying degrees of MPR-independent transport. We have demonstrated that the transport of cathepsin D is partially dependent upon sortilin, that cathepsin H requires sortilin, and that cathepsins K and L attain the lysosomes in a sortilin-independent fashion. As a type-1 receptor, sortilin also has numerous cytosolic binding partners. It has been observed that like the MPR, the anterograde trafficking of sortilin and its cargo require both GGAs and AP-1. Similarly, the retrograde recycling pathway of sortilin also involves an interaction with retromer through a YXXphi site in the cytosolic tail of sortilin. In conclusion, the cytosolic domains of sortilin and MPR possess a high degree of functional homology and both receptors share a conserved trafficking mechanism.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".