MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W121961308

Томское отделение Императорского русского музыкального общества как социокультурный феномен Сибири конца XIX начала XX в

2014· article· ru· W121961308 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueВестник Томского государственного университета. История · 2014
Typearticle
Languageru
FieldComputer Science
TopicScientific Research and Philosophical Inquiry
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsQuarter (Canadian coin)Point (geometry)HistoryGeographyArchaeologyMathematics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The article considers the Tomsk Branch of the Imperial Russian Musical Society (TB IRMS) as a socio-cultural phenomenon in the entire Asian part of Russia in the last quarter of the 19 th early 20 th centuries. The author identifies objective and subjective reasons for the successful activity of the TB IRMS. In this period of history Branches of IRMS were opened at many points in the area from the Urals to the Pacific: in Nerchinsk (1874/75), Omsk (1876), Tobolsk (1878), Tomsk (1879), Irkutsk (1901) and Vladivostok (1909). However, already by 1917 the Branches in Irkutsk and Nerchinsk had no longer existed, their activities stopped for different reasons. On this background, what explains the viability and especial success of the IRMS Tomsk Branch? In our view, this is accounted for by the presence of the three indispensable factors (elements): the individual enthusiast (idea carrier), society's willingness to accept this (i.e., the degree to which the society needs this idea), and, finally, the financial resources to implement this (or the given plan). It is this an individual, a carrier of the the social environment with its spiritual needs the availability of material resources for the implementation of the idea that is the key to the success of each endeavor. In our case this endeavor was the establishment of the IRMS Branch. If at least one of these components is missing, the whole structure collapses which in the best case leads to the tipping and in the worst case to the point of no return (as it happened with the Nerchinsk and Irkutsk Branches of the IRMS). The article examines the impact of all these factors on the establishment and activities of the IRMS Branches in the cities of Siberia and the Russian Far East, such as Omsk, Tobolsk, Tomsk, Krasnoyarsk, Irkutsk, Nerchinsk, Vladivostok. Tomsk, as the first University city of Siberia, was lucky. Here, all the three components of the triad had combined in a puzzle by 1879. And the Tomsk Branch of the IRMS developed actively, opening in 1893 Classes of Music which were later transformed into a Musical College. In 2012 it celebrated its centenary (like many other musical colleges in the European part of Russia). After the IRMS, the engendering of the Tsarism, was dissolved in 1917, its educational element proved to be rather viable. A bright example of this is the School of Music in Tomsk which had been opened before the revolution and continued to develop throughout the 20 th century, earning a reputation of the most professional school in the cultural space not only of the city, but of the whole Siberian region.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.012
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Open science, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Open science, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.760
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0120.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0060.005
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0060.004
Bibliometrics0.0040.011
Science and technology studies0.0050.007
Scholarly communication0.0090.006
Open science0.0200.008
Research integrity0.0040.008
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.036

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.075
GPT teacher head0.326
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it