MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W12232572 · doi:10.1177/106689690201000304

Do Props Matter in the Dramatic Play Center? The Effects of Prop Realism on Children's Play.

2001· article· en· W12232572 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Claudia Hogan, Nina Howe

Bibliographic record

VenueEarly childhood education · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicChild Development and Digital Technology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCenter (category theory)RealismPsychologyAestheticsArtVisual artsChemistryCrystallography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Calcifying fibrous pseudotumor (CFP) has been postulated to be a "late" stage of inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor (IMT). We analyzed 15 cases (8 females and 7 males; aged 1 to 65 years). The anatomic distribution was wide, including 3 cases each in neck, mesentery/omentum, and GI tract and 2 cases each in mediastinum and paratesticular sites. Follow-up information was available in 10 patients (range 4 to 228 months). Local recurrence occurred in 3 patients and was repeated in 2. Tumor size ranged from 0.6 to 25 cm. Lesions were well-circumscribed hypocellular spindle cell proliferations with dense stromal collagen, a lymphoplasmacytic infiltrate, and stromal calcifications. Features of conventional IMT were not seen. Immunostaining showed CD34 positivity in most cases as well as rare cells positive for smooth muscle actin and desmin, and consistent negativity for ALK-1 and S-100 protein. These findings suggest that CFP is a distinctive benign mesenchymal neoplasm with a low risk for recurrence and, therefore, best labelled as "calcifying fibrous tumor." There is no convincing evidence to support an association between CFP and IMT.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.622
Threshold uncertainty score0.291

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEarly childhood educationSame topicChild Development and Digital TechnologyFrench-language works237,207