Tracker: a framework to support reducing rework through decision management
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
With an aging population and limited health care resources, reflection on end-of-life care is essential. While terminally ill cancer patients spend much of their last year in the home, the literature reveals that the majority of these patients would also prefer to die at home. Despite patients' and families' cited preference for home deaths, dying at home continues to be infrequent. In Edmonton's Capital Health Region (CHR) only 16% of cancer patients died at home in 1999. While many reasons for the low incidence of home death are cited, little data exists regarding discharges from the palliative home care program in the CHR. As such, it is difficult to assess where resources are needed in the community. The implementation of a discharge assessment tool for use in the Capital Health Palliative Home Care program may provide insight into potential correlates of home death. Not only providing information on individual patients, the inclusion of such data in the palliative home care database would allow for trends to be monitored over time.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it