MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1231400548

Organized Agents: Canadian Teacher Unions as Alternative Sites for Social Justice Activism

2008· article· en· W1231400548 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Cindy Rottmann

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicTeacher Education and Leadership Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSocial justiceSociologyEconomic JusticeHumanitiesPolitical scienceEthnologyLawSocial scienceArt
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Historically teachers ’ federations have been some of the major organizational sites for social justice leadership in K-12 public education. Despite this history of activism, social justice teacher unionism remains a relatively underdeveloped concept. This article merges four philosophical conceptions of social justice in education: liberal recognition, critical recognition, liberal distribution, and critical distribution, with an analysis of equity-based initiatives articulated on the Web sites of 20 Canadian teach-ers ’ organizations. The resulting framework can be used by teacher union researchers interested in generating a broader conception of social justice unionism, and teacher unionists interested in investigating their organizational practices through a social justice lens. Key words: teacher activism, teacher unionism, social justice, teacher leadership Depuis toujours, les fédérations d’enseignants font partie des principales organisa-tions qui militent pour la justice sociale dans le secteur M-12 au sein des écoles publi-ques. En dépit de cette tradition d’activisme, le syndicalisme axé sur la justice sociale chez les enseignants demeure un concept relativement peu développé. Cet article fusionne quatre conceptions philosophiques de la justice sociale en éducation – la reconnaissance libérale, la reconnaissance critique, la répartition libérale et la réparti-tion critique- avec une analyse de diverses initiatives axées sur l’équité sur les sites Web de vingt regroupements d’enseignants canadiens. Le cadre qui en résulte peut être utilisé par des chercheurs s’intéressant aux syndicats d’enseignants et voulant susciter une conception élargie du syndicalisme et de la justice sociale et par des syn-dicalistes désirant analyser leurs pratiques organisationnelles à travers la lorgnette de la justice sociale. Mots clés: activisme chez les enseignants, syndicat d’enseignants, justice sociale, leadership des enseignants

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.072
Threshold uncertainty score0.351

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.004
Science and technology studies0.0210.008
Scholarly communication0.0110.003
Open science0.0020.005
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0140.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.259
GPT teacher head0.432
Teacher spread0.173 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicTeacher Education and Leadership StudiesFrench-language works237,207