Corrección de la sonrisa con toxina botulínica en un paciente con parálisis facial
Bibliographic record
Abstract
La paralisis facial altera la funcion muscular desencadenando diversas alteraciones funcionales, psicologicas, emocionales, esteticas y sociales. Existen multiples causas y tratamientos quirurgicos y no quirurgicos para tratar el lado paralizado. Sin embargo, en pacientes con paralisis facial de larga evolucion, en quienes el tratamiento quirurgico ha generado minimos beneficios o pacientes no candidatos a tratamientos quirurgicos, el uso de toxina botulinica es una alternativa viable para tratar lado afectado cuando existen secuelas como sincinesias, hipertonia o espasmo hemifacial. En el lado no afectado tambien se utiliza para ocasionar simetria estetica y funcional estatica y dinamica. Se presenta un caso clinico de un paciente varon con paralisis facial idiopatica derecha tratado con quimiodenervacion contralateral selectiva con toxina botulinica y su evolucion favorable hacia la funcionalidad y normalizacion de la simetria facial dinamica
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".