Canadian Respirologists’ Experience with Lymphangioleiomyomatosis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Lymphangioleiomyomatosis (LAM) is a rare pulmonary disease occurring primarily in women. A literature review of LAM in Canada found sporadic mention of LAM in case reports or within lung transplant studies. The LAM Foundation, a patient support and research funding organization, lists 23 Canadian patients in its database. The present study was designed to assess the scope of LAM across Canada and to identify potential patients for further evaluation. OBJECTIVES: To ascertain Canadian respirologists' experience with patients with LAM (current and historical), lung transplantation (single or bilateral) and deaths due to LAM, and awareness of the LAM Foundation. METHODS: Four hundred twelve brief surveys were sent anonymously to members of the Canadian Lung Association (inserted in their newsletters) to ascertain the experience of Canadian respirologists with LAM. RESULTS: One hundred twelve surveys were returned (27%). Fifty-one respondents had "ever" been involved in the care of at least one patient with LAM; eight had cared for three or more patients. At the time of the study, 26 respondents were following a total of 46 patients with LAM; 22 of the 51 respirologists (43%) who had ever cared for a patient with LAM reported the death of a patient. Thirty-three patients had been put on wait lists for transplantation; six died while on the wait list. Nineteen patients underwent lung transplantation--six single-lung recipients and 13 bilateral lung recipients. Of the 51 respirologists who had ever cared for a patient with LAM, only 30 (61%) were aware of the LAM Foundation's services. Of the 112 respondents, only 47 (43%) were aware of the LAM Foundation. CONCLUSIONS: This study identified a moderate level of awareness of a significant existing patient support and research service (the LAM Foundation). There were many patients with LAM who were unknown to the LAM Foundation and could benefit from its resources. Results suggest that there may be more patients with LAM in Canada than are reported in the existing literature.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.008 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".