MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W12400027 · doi:10.1055/s-2002-35056

Slope Conditions for Stability of ACIMs of Dynamical Systems

2013· dissertation· en· W12400027 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Zhenyang Li

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicMathematical Dynamics and Fractals
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersConcordia University
KeywordsMathematicsAbsolute continuityConjectureInvariant measureEigenvalues and eigenvectorsInvariant (physics)Measure (data warehouse)Upper and lower boundsDynamical systems theoryLimitingInstabilitySingular valueMathematical analysisCombinatoricsPure mathematicsMathematical physicsPhysicsQuantum mechanicsErgodic theory

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The family of $W-$shaped maps was introduced in 1982 by G. Keller. Based on the investigation of the properties of the maps, it was conjectured that instability of the absolutely continuous invariant measure (acim) can result only from the existence of small invariant neighbourhoods of the fixed critical point of the limiting map. We show that the conjecture is not true by constructing a family of $W-$shaped maps with acims supported on the entire interval, whose limiting dynamical behavior is described by a singular \nmeasure. We then generalize the above result by constructing families of $W-$shaped maps $\\{W_a\\}$ with a turning fixed point having slope $s_1$ on one side and $-s_2$ on the other. Each such $W_a$ map has an acim $\\mu_a$. Depending on whether $\\frac{1}{s_1}+\\frac{1}{s_2}$ is larger, equal, or smaller than 1, we show that the limit of $\\mu_a$ is a singular measure, a combination of singular and absolutely continuous measure or an acim, respectively. We also consider $W$-shaped maps satisfying $\\frac 1{s_1}+\\frac 1{s_2}=1$ and show that the eigenvalue $1$ of the associated Perron-Frobenius operator is not stable, which in turn implies the instability of the isolated spectrum. Motivated by the above results, we introduce the harmonic average of slopes condition, with which we obtain new explicit constants for the upper and lower bounds of the invariant probability density function associated with the map, as well as a bound for the speed of convergence to the density. Moreover, we prove stability results using Rychlik's Theorem together with the harmonic average of slopes condition for piecewise expanding maps.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.014
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.041

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.014
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0040.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0120.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.348
Teacher spread0.301 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMathematical Dynamics and FractalsFrench-language works237,207