Redox Noninnocence of the Bridge in Copper(II) Salophen and Bis(oxamato) Complexes
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Two square-planar copper(II) complexes of 1,2-bis(2-hydroxy-3,5-di-tert-butylbenzimino)-4,5-bis(dimethylamino)benzene (1) and N-[4,5-bis(dimethylamino)-2-(oxalylamino)benzene]oxamate (2(2-)) were prepared. The crystal structures of the proligands H2L(1) and Et2H2L(2), as well as the corresponding complexes, are reported. The proligands each display a one-electron-oxidation wave, which is assigned to oxidation of the bis(dimethylamino)benzene moiety into a π radical. Complexes 1 and 2(2-) exhibit reversible one-electron-oxidation waves in their cyclic voltammograms (E1/2(1) = 0.14 and E1/2(2) = 0.31 V for 1 and E1/2(1) = -0.47 V vs Fc(+)/Fc for 2(2-)). The first process corresponds to oxidation of the bis(dimethylamino)benzene central ring into a π radical, while the second process for 1 is ascribed to oxidation of the π radical into an α-diiminoquinone. The one-electron-oxidized species 1(+) and 2(-) exhibit intense visible-near-IR absorptions, which are diagnostic of π radicals. They display a triplet signal in their electron paramagnetic resonance spectra, which stem from magnetic coupling between the ligand-radical spin and the copper(II) spin. The zero-field-splitting parameters are larger for 2(-) than 1(+) because of greater delocalization of the spin density onto the coordinated amidato N atoms. Density functional theory calculations support a π-radical nature of the one-electron-oxidized complexes, as well as S = 1 ground spin states. The electrogenerated 1(2+) comprises a closed-shell diiminoquinone ligand coordinated to a copper(II) metal center. Both 1 and 2 catalyze the aerobic oxidation of benzyl alcohol, albeit with different yields.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it