Stability of Structural Form during Infiltration Laboratory Measurements on the Effect of De‐inking Sludge
Bibliographic record
Abstract
An adequate understanding of the mechanisms involved in the structural stabilization of soil by different sources of organic matter is needed to help design management strategies aimed at maintaining a stable soil structure. The objective of this study was to identify mechanisms involved in soil structure stabilization by paper sludge application, either by increasing the soil resistance to external stresses (aggregate stability) or by decreasing the magnitude of the external stresses (diminution of the wetting rate). A laboratory study was conducted on three different soil types with application of paper sludge at three rates (8, 16, and 24 dry t ha −1 ). The mean weight diameter, bulk density, hydraulic conductivity, and water retention properties were measured before and after a wetting event. The results indicate that most of the changes in physical properties resulting from rapid wetting took place at the soil surface (0–50 mm) and the magnitude of these changes gradually decreased down to a depth of 150 mm. Paper sludge application significantly improved the stability of 1‐ to 4‐mm aggregates to the destructive action of wetting in all three soil types. Paper sludge application increased porosity at potential > −2 kPa, which resulted in higher hydraulic conductivity values (up to 88%) and a smaller increase in soil bulk density (down to 67%) relative to a control following rapid wetting. The wetting rates observed during the wetting event were similar regardless of the treatment, because the increase in the water potential at the wetting front was compensated for by an increase in hydraulic conductivity with increasing rates of sludge application.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".