MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W1273793434 · doi:10.30497/law.2012.1289

Les conditions d\'existence de la responsabilité contractuelle du transporteur aérien à l\'égard du passager en Systèm de Varsovie et dans la Convention de Montréal (1999).

2007· article· fr· W1273793434 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
amir hosain fakhari, moslem mohammad zadeh

Bibliographic record

VenueDOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) · 2007
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicInternational Law and Aviation
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhilosophyHumanities

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Outrel’existence d’un contrat valide entre le transporteur et le passager, troisconditions caractérisent la responsabilité contractuelle : le préjudice,l’inexécution de contrat et le lien de causalité. La responsabilité dutransporteur aérien à l’égard du passager s’ouvre en cas de mort, de lésioncorporelle et de retard. Le transporteur aérien est responsable du préjudice survenu en cas de mort ou delésion corporelle subi par un passagerpar cela seul que l’accident qui a causé la mort ou la lésion corporelle s’est produit à bord de l’aéronef ou au cours de toutes opérationsd’embarquement ou débarquement. On étudie ici, tout d’abord, la notion destermes suivants : accident, à bord de l’aéronef, embarquement,débarquement, lésion corporelle. Ensuite, on précise la notion du retard dansle transport aérien du passager et sa divergence avec l’inexécution du contratde transport aérien. Enfin, il convient d’examiner les autres conditions de laresponsabilité du transporteur aérien à l’égard du passager.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.782
Threshold uncertainty score0.439

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0060.005
Scholarly communication0.0050.003
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0370.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.092
GPT teacher head0.519
Teacher spread0.427 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)→Same topicInternational Law and Aviation→French-language works237,207→