Polar Motion with Daily and Sub-daily Time Resolution
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Since 1992 the IGS ACs (International GPS Service Analysis Centers) have delivered daily estimates of polar motion (PM) and length of day (LOD) to the IERS (International Earth Rotation Service). The IGS combined PM and LOD series are available since January 1, 1995. Since June 1996 the IGS rapid and the final combined orbits are accompanied with two distinct IGS combined PM series with the same time resolution of one day. Both, the IGS final and rapid combined PM series also include combined PM rate data as well as LOD, starting in March 1997. Since 1995 the CODE Analysis Center of the IGS has produced PM and LOD estimates with a two-hour time resolution on a routine basis. A study of the time series with sub-daily time resolution clearly shows the half-daily and daily tidal signals. The results correspond very well to those obtained from satellite altimetry. These sub-daily time series are based on the same observational data from the IGS tracking network as those time series with a one-day time resolution. It would thus be possible with a minor analysis effort,withoutadditional observational effort, to come up with a long and consistent series of PM and LOD with a time resolution of about 1 to 2 hours.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".