MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Abstract 1694: Reduced Incidence of Contrast Induced Nephropathy after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention with Routine Use of Visipaque in Unselected Patients

2007· article· en· W127710158 on OpenAlexaffabout
Jonas Eichhöfer, Joan Ivanov, Mark Osten, Karen Mackie, Vladimír Džavík

Bibliographic record

VenueCirculation · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAcute Kidney Injury Research
Canadian institutionsToronto General Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineConventional PCIContrast-induced nephropathyPercutaneous coronary interventionNephropathyInternal medicineIncidence (geometry)Prospective cohort studyCreatininePropensity score matchingCardiologySurgeryMyocardial infarctionDiabetes mellitusEndocrinology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objective: An observational study to determine if the routine use of Visipague contrast solution was associated with a decreased incidence of contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) in patients following PCI at a large, tertiary cardiac centre. Methods: The Toronto General Hospital Interventional Cardiology Program maintains a prospective registry of all PCI procedures12951 consecutive patients undergoing PCI from a prospective data registry were assigned to either Period 1 (2000 – 03, various contrast agents were utilized) or Period 2 (2003– 06, only Visipaque was used). The contrast agent was changed systematically to the iso-osmolar agent, Visipaque. CIN was defined as an increase in plasma creatinine of >25% within 24 hours following PCI. Using propensity scores, 2502 consecutive patients undergoing PCI in Period 1, were randomly matched to 2502 patients in Period 2. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to identify the independent predictors of CIN. Results: The two well matched cohorts showed no significant differences in major pre-procedure clinical variables. Visipaque was associated with a lower rate of CIN after PCI (Period 1 = 14%, Period 2 = 7%, p<0.001). The multivariate independent predictors of CIN were: Visipaque (OR 0.437, p<0.001), contrast media volume per 10 ml (OR 1.015; p<0.0001), pre-procedure creatinine per 10mmol/L (OR 1.013; p=0.003), ACS (OR 2.861; p <0.001), PCI following thrombolysis (OR 1.952; p=0.022), peripheral vascular disease (OR 1.375; p=0.023), and age per decade over 40 (OR 1.143; p=0.001) Conclusions: After adjusting for significant predictors of CIN, a strategy of routine use of an iso-osmolar contrast agent (Visipaque) appeared to be associated with a lower risk of developing CIN after PCI, especially in higher risk patients. Contrast volume, ACS and age were the most powerful predictors of development of contrast nephropathy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.295
Teacher spread0.274 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCirculation→Same topicAcute Kidney Injury Research→French-language works237,207→