Protecting children from domestic violence : strategies for community intervention
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Part 1: Introduction to the Problem. Jaffe, Baker, Cunningham, Purpose and Overview. Edleson, Should Childhood Exposure to Adult Domestic Violence Be Defined as Child Maltreatment under the Law? Rossman, Rea, Graham-Bermann, Butterfield, Young Children Exposed to Adult Domestic Violence: Incidence, Assessment, and Intervention. Davis, Group Intervention with Abusive Male Adolescents. Part 2: Individual- and Group-Level Responses. Graham-Bermann, Halabu, Fostering Resilient Coping in Children Exposed to Violence: Cultural Considerations. Hardesty, Campbell, Safety Planning for Abused Women and Their Children. Bancroft, Silverman, Assessing Abusers' Risks to Children. Williams, Boggess, Carter, Fatherhood and Domestic Violence: Exploring the Role of Abusive Men in the Lives of Their Children. Part 3: System-Level Responses. Kamateros, The Ethnic Media Outreach Project: 'Canada Is a Country for Women'. Berkman, Casey, Berkowitz, Marans, Police in the Lives of Children Exposed to Domestic Violence: Collaborative Approaches to Intervention. Shaffer, Bala, The Role of Family Courts in Domestic Violence: The Canadian Experience. Dunford-Jackson, The Role of Family Courts in Domestic Violence: The U.S. Experience. Jaffe, Wolfe, Crooks, Hughes, Baker, The Fourth R: Developing Healthy Relationships through School-Based Interventions. Part 4: Conclusions. Baker, Cunningham, Jaffe, Future Directions in Ending Domestic Violence in the Lives of Children.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.004 | 0.010 |
| Research integrity | 0.005 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.037 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".