MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W130115003 · doi:10.4000/lhomme.28724

Nick J. Enfield & Stephen C. Levinson, eds, Roots of Human Sociality

2009· article· en· W130115003 on OpenAlex
Julien Bonhomme

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueL Homme · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicLinguistics and Discourse Analysis
Canadian institutionsMusée de la Civilisation
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSocialityPhilosophyCognitive sciencePsychoanalysisSociologyPsychologyBiologyEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cet ouvrage collectif s’intéresse aux fondements de la socialité humaine dans une perspective interdisciplinaire. Dirigé par Stephen Levinson et Nick Enfield, chercheurs au Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics (Pays-Bas) où ils s’occupent d’un projet intitulé « Language & Cognition », ce livre rassemble les contributions d’une vingtaine de spécialistes de diverses disciplines, la plupart de réputation internationale. Fruit d’un colloque organisé par la Wenner-Gren Foundation en 2004, l’...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.812
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.075
GPT teacher head0.322
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it