MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W130810173

Graptolite Biostratigraphy of the Mungok Formation (Early Ordovician) in the Hwabyung Area, Yeongwol, Korea

2003· article· en· W130810173 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Teak-Ja Kim, Young-Pil Jin, Jeong-Yul Kim

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Korean earth science society · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicPaleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiozoneBiostratigraphyOrdovicianPaleontologyGeologyChinaGeographyArchaeology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Five species of graptolites belonging to four genera were described from the upper part of the Mungok Formation in the Hwabyung area of Yeongwol, Korea. They are Dendrograptus sp., Callograptus curvithecalis Mu 1955, Adeiograptus tenellus Linnarsson, 1871, Adelograptus sp., and Psigraptus jacksoni Rickards and Stait, 1984. Most of them are reported for the second time in Korea, and the occurrence of Psigraptus is the sixth time ever in the world, following the Yukon Territory of Canada, the Vctoria and Tasmania areas of Australia, and the Jilin and Hebei areas of China. Based on the graptolites, three biozones were recognized from the upper part of the Mungok Formation in the Hwabyung area: the Adelograptus Zone, the Callograptus-Dend개graptus Zone, and the Psigraptus Zone, in ascending order. These graptolite zones are correlated with the La 1.5 Zone (Psigraptus and Clonograptus Zone or Assemblage 3) of Vctoria, Australia, the Psigraptus Zone of the Road River Formation in Yukon, Canada, and the Psigraptus Zone of the Yehli Formation of Hunjiang, Jilin, nonh China. Therefore, according to the graptolites and their biozones, the age of the upper part of the Mungok Formation is assigned to be early Late Tremadoc.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.651

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.214
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Korean earth science societySame topicPaleontology and Stratigraphy of FossilsFrench-language works237,207