MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W131179603

Modeling Study of ozone formation/distribution in the southern Iran

2009· article· en· W131179603 on OpenAlexaff
Ehsan Khorsandi, Mahmoud Taghavi

Bibliographic record

VenueEGU General Assembly Conference Abstracts · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicAtmospheric chemistry and aerosols
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCMAQOzoneEnvironmental scienceAir quality indexNOxOzone Monitoring InstrumentOil refineryMeteorologyEmission inventoryAtmospheric sciencesWaste managementChemistryGeographyCombustionEngineering
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

High ozone levels were observed in Southern Iran, Over BandarAbbas coastal area and Persian Gulf, in the summer of 2007 and 2008. Comprehension of the chemistry of the air mass is important in order to develop the most effective ozone abatement strategies. Modeling is a powerful tool to access chemical special with high temporal and space resolution. This study was done using the MM5/SMOKE/CMAQ regional air quality modeling system, together with observational data from satellite measurements over the modeling domain. By validating and improving of simulations based on Taylor’s diagram, some scenarios were developed to model the ozone background concentration and understand the sensitivity of ozone to NOx (NOx=NO+NO2) and VOC (volatile organic compounds). Results from an arbitrary reduction of thermal power plants and petrol refineries will be discussed, due to NOx and VOC species in these point source emission inventories. The ozone production rate was extracted from the model and mapped for June 2001 because of a strong interest in determining regions contributing to ozone production and consumption.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.672
Threshold uncertainty score0.353

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEGU General Assembly Conference AbstractsSame topicAtmospheric chemistry and aerosolsFrench-language works237,207