MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

RGDSK/K rosette nanotubes induce inflammation and apoptosis through phosphorylation of p38 MAPK in human lung adenocarcinoma (Calu‐3) cells

2009· article· en· W132682449 on OpenAlexafffund
Sarabjeet Singh, Andrew J. Myles, Hicham Fenniri, Baljit Singh

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicMicroRNA in disease regulation
Canadian institutionsNational Institute for NanotechnologyUniversity of AlbertaUniversity of Saskatchewan
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaAlberta Agricultural Research Institute
KeywordsApoptosisp38 mitogen-activated protein kinasesBiologyPhosphorylationDNA fragmentationMAPK/ERK pathwayCancer researchMolecular biologyCell biologyProgrammed cell deathBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Rosette nanotubes (RNTs), a novel class of biologically inspired nanotubes, hold tremendous potential as targeted drug delivery shuttle. We synthesized hybrid RNTs that composed of RGDSK‐ and K‐functionalized RNTs in a ratio of 1:10 M (RGDSK/K‐RNTs). We noticed the expression of avb3 integrin on Calu‐3 cells and believe that these RNTs may bind to integrin. We investigated cell signaling events caused by these RNTs for induction of inflammation and apoptosis in Calu‐3 cells. RGDSK/K‐RNTs rapidly induced phosphorylation of p38 MAPK. RGDSK/K‐RNTs (>10:100 μM) promoted p38 MAPK‐dependent secretion of TNF‐α. All the tested concentrations of RGDSK/K‐RNTs resulted in an increase in caspase‐3 activity and DNA fragmentation in Calu‐3 cells at 18 hours of the exposure. Blocking phosphorylation of p38 MAPK strongly inhibited caspase‐3 activity and DNA fragmentation. Pro‐apoptotic properties of RGDSK/K‐RNTs were also supported by over‐expression of pro‐apoptotic genes. We therefore conclude that RGDSK/K‐RNTs induce phosphorylation of p38 MAPK, which regulates secretion of TNF‐α, activation of caspase‐3 and apoptosis in Calu‐3 cells. These results suggest that the RGDSK/K‐RNTs could be used as a drug to induce apoptosis in cancer cells or as a versatile platform to deliver a variety of biologically active molecules for cancer therapy. Support: NSERC, AARI. Grant Funding Source NSERC discovery, AARI

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.000
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB Journal→Same topicMicroRNA in disease regulation→French-language works237,207→