Physical Behavior of Fungal Biomasses during Vacuum Agitated Contact Drying
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In order to recover their dry matter, two different polysaccharide products obtained from fungal biomasses are dried in a vacuum agitated contact dryer. The first product has an initial moisture content of 10.72 kg/kg (dry basis) (Prod. 1) and the second, 21.27 kg/kg (dry basis) (Prod. 2). The vacuum drier allows control on the applied pressure and consequently the required vacuum rate, wall temperature and rotation impeller velocity. The experimental results show that when applying this drying process, the products undergo the following three phases: a short adaptation phase, a long constant drying rate phase then a falling drying rate phase. On the other hand, the determination of the torque data gives clear information about the transformation of the products from liquid to granular solid phase. Determination of the influent parameters shows that increasing temperature or impeller velocity allows increasing the evaporated water and consequently reducing drying time. However, increasing pressure level or the initial product mass plays a negative role since it increase as well drying time. The comparison between vacuum contact drying and vacuum agitated contact drying shows that using agitation reduces significantly drying time. The study is ended by performing a modelling work allowing the calculation of some transfer parameters such as heat transfer coefficient between the heated wall and the dried product.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".