MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Spectrin is a crucial component of EPEC pedestals

2010· article· en· W13338978 on OpenAlexafffund
Tyson Joel Ruetz, Julian A. Guttman

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicEscherichia coli research studies
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsIntiminCytoskeletonSpectrinCell biologyBiologyActinEffectorCytoplasmEnteropathogenic Escherichia coliActin cytoskeletonVirulenceMutantCellGeneticsGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Enteropathogenic E.coli (EPEC) is one of the main pathogens contributing to roughly 2 million diarrhea related child deaths worldwide each year. Upon ingestion of contaminated food or water, EPEC colonize the intestinal tracts of their hosts, attach to the surface of enterocytes and generate characteristic attaching and effacing (A/E) lesions. These lesions involve the collapse of host microvilli and the generation of pedestal‐like structures atop infected cells. Pedestal formation and disease progression is induced by bacterial proteins (effectors) that are translocated into the host cell cytoplasm by a syringe‐like type‐three secretion system (T3SS). The three major components of the host cell cytoskeleton; actin, microtubules and intermediate filaments, are all altered during EPEC pathogenesis. We have identified another major host cytoskeletal network that is involved in EPEC disease, the spectrin cytoskeleton. Here we demonstrate that spectrin is recruited to the base of EPEC pedestals and through the use of EPEC effector mutants, we show that this localization is mediated by the translocated intimin receptor (Tir). Spectrin knockdowns using siRNA have revealed that spectrin is necessary for pedestal formation to occur. Our findings provide the first evidence of spectrin's involvement in EPEC pathogenesis and identify it as a crucial protein involved in pedestal formation and disease progression. Grant Funding Source: CIHR, NSERC

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.285
Teacher spread0.270 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB Journal→Same topicEscherichia coli research studies→French-language works237,207→