Effects of a cognitive specific imagery intervention on the soccer skill performance of young athletes aged 11-12 and 13-14 : a developmental perspective
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The primary purpose of the present study was to examine the effects of a cognitive specific imagery intervention on the soccer skill performance of young athletes aged 11--12 and 13--14 years and determine if such performances vary with age and gender. A secondary purpose was to determine if such performances are a result of imagery function. Participants were 68 soccer athletes belonging to eight different teams. Teams were randomly assigned to either a CS or MG-A imagery group. Athletes were administered the SIQ-C and tested on the soccer skill to determine baseline performance. Following the intervention, athletes were tested on the same soccer skill, and completed the SIQ-C. Athletes in the current study did not increase their frequency of imagery use, nor did they improve their performance. Performances varied with respect to gender however, no significant age group differences were present. Reasons for these findings are discussed.Dept. of Human Kinetics. Paper copy at Leddy Library: Theses & Major Papers - Basement, West Bldg. / Call Number: Thesis2006 .M87. Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 45-01, page: 0487. Thesis (M.H.K.)--University of Windsor (Canada), 2006.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it