MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W134948501

An Annotated Bibliography of Works on P.K. Page (1985–2002)

2018· article· en· W134948501 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Erin Whitmore

Bibliographic record

VenueProject Muse (Johns Hopkins University) · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicPoetry Analysis and Criticism
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStanzaPoetryContext (archaeology)LiteratureArt historyArtHistory
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

following bibliography was prepared by Erin Whitmore, a graduate student in Canadian Studies and Native Studies Masters program at Trent University, under supervision Zailig Pollock. It consist an update Part II: Works on PK. Page John Orange's bibliography in Volume 6 Annotated Bibliography Canada's Major Authors. Each section this bibliography is organized chronologically. We would like to thank Sandra Djwa, Cynthia Messenger, John Orange and Brian Trehearne for their comments and suggestions. Articles and sections Books Bentley, D.M.R. ? Subtle Mourning': P.K. Page's 'The Permanent Tourists.' In Literary Theory in Classroom: Three Views P.K. Page's 'The Permanent Tourists.' Canadian Poetry 19 (Fall-Winter 1986): 68-73. Bentley undertakes a Page's The Permanent Tourists in context orientation in Canadian poetry. Bentley's analysis focusses primarily on instances mise en paysage developing a poem/photograph parallel out rectilinear stanzas, as well as modes representation involved in poem - poetry and photography. Included excerpts from two letters written to Page, in which she is questioned concerning this stanza/photograph parallel and to which she replies the rectangular stanzas - may well have thought them as photographs.... all say is that if didn't think it at time, should have! Bentley studies in detail penultimate stanza. Page's poem is a product high modernism as is evidenced in its elevated conception art and artist. Bentley concludes that despite seeming [inescapability] being a permanent tourist, in poetry of baseland orientation ... in our encounters with fellow tourists, there will be at least moments clairvoyance and empathy when gaps drop. Neuman, Shirley. Teaching P.K. Page's 'The Permanent Tourists.' In Literary Theory in Classroom: Three Views P.K. Page's 'The Permanent Tourists.' Canadian Poetry 19 (Fall-Winter 1986): 65-68. Neuman undertakes a close reading Page's The Permanent Tourists, choosing to !emphasize] tropes and rather than image. In doing so Neuman focusses on three figures: first on physics light, inquires do tourists see?; second, exploring Otherness,' suggests that tourists are Other' in foreign cities they enter; third considers the oxymoron poem's title, asking how can those who travel ... be permanent? A consideration these three figures leads Neuman to propose that rhetorical structure poem is consistently oxymoronic, playing off emptiness and reflection, otherness and essence, tourism and permanence. In her Neuman attempts to be self-conscious about reader. Ricou, Laurie. Literary Theory in Classroom: Three Views P.K. Page's 'The Permanent Tourists': Introduction. Canadian Poetry 19 (Fall-Winter 1986): 57-59. Page's poem The Permanent Tourists is chosen to be considered critically by three critics selected by Ricou: Kay Stockholder, Shirley Neuman and D.M.R. Bentley. This is part annual conference Association Canadian Universities Teachers English (ACUTE) in 1985. aim is to discover our theoretical positions, as academic critics and writers, affect what we do in classroom. When asked for permission to distribute a copy poem at conference, Page, after agreeing, states, I find it all quite hilarious and hope you don't mind my mirth. It is hard to believe that one is taken seriously. Stockholder, Kay. Devouring Eyes in Permanent Tourists' and Cry Ararat! In Literary Theory in Classroom: Three Views P.K. Page's 'The Permanent Tourists.' Canadian Poetry 19 (Fall-Winter 1986): 59-64. Stockholder provides a detailed analysis The Permanent Tourists. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.278
Threshold uncertainty score0.810

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0120.034
Science and technology studies0.0050.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.003
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.2420.128

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProject Muse (Johns Hopkins University)→Same topicPoetry Analysis and Criticism→French-language works237,207→