Extraordinary Canonical Form of Marriage When a Qualified Witness Cannot Be Present without a Brave Inconvenience
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Il peut exister des situations ou la forme canonique ordinaire ne peut etre observee sans de graves inconvenients parce que le couple ne peut aller trouver un pretre ou un diacre qualifies. Le canon 1116 enumere les exigences pour la forme canonique extraordinaire, i.e. l'echange de consentements devant les seuls temoins. Ceci est possible lorsqu'on est dans une situation in mortis periculo, ou si les conditions necessaires sont presentes en-dehors du danger de mort, qu'il est prevu que la situation durera un mois et qu'une personne competente ne peut etre presente ou contactee sans grave inconvenient. Lorsque ces conditions sont presentes, le couple a le droit de contracter un mariage valide et licite devant les seuls temoins. Aucune dispense ou permission de l'autorite ecclesiastique competente n'est necessaire. Ces mariages doivent etre inscrits dans le registre de mariages. L'A. recommande que les fideles soient instruits de la forme extraordinaire. L'article termine avec une formule utile pour la declaration d'un couple qui contractera un mariage selon la forme extraordinaire.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.011 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.025 | 0.006 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".